EDGE: Your Community. Your Advantage.

EDGE Development is a program as unique as Georgia’s Energy Cities. Designed specifically for the elected officials and staff of communities with enterprise operations, it provides the tools and support they need to lead prosperously. With an emphasis on strategy, industry and academic experts introduce a no-nonsense, customizable approach to improving a community’s quality of life through vision, planning and focused leadership.

Georgia’s Energy Cities have a long history of success driven by strong leaders and an enduring commitment to economic well being. Continued prosperity in today’s new age of acceleration requires the elected officials and staff of these communities to embrace change, adapt, and establish a broader perspective of modern economic development principles. Those with a competitive edge understand that cross-generational strategies are essential to building assets that will last for generations.
To learn more visit https://ecoga.org/edge-development
(be sure to click on the video play button to see some surprise guests)

For additional information on this program, please contact Michelle Weekley at mweekley@ecoga.org



Manufacturing Defends Natural Gas Industry

In a recent Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) filing in support of a Connecticut natural gas pipeline expansion project, the Industrial Energy Consumers of America (IECA) organization filed comments that scrutinized the motives and means of anti-fossil fuels activists. Their filing encouraged regulatory authorities to consider the economic impact of natural gas, the need for more streamline permitting procedures and to approve this particular project.

The IECA represents manufacturing operations in the United States who stated “if we do not have sufficient deliverability capabilities to move natural gas to operate our facilities, we’ll have no choice but to relocate to other states or offshore.” The IECA represents leading manufacturing companies in diverse industries, including chemical, plastic, food processing, glass, pharmaceuticals, building products, and other products employing more than 1.6 million people in the US.

The filing urged the FERC to dismiss the “Keep it in the Ground” activists’ claims because they do not represent the will or needs of energy consumers. According to FERC documents, “These activists do not represent consumers in the state and they are not accountable for millions of employees who work in our factories in order to sustain their families and lifestyles. They represent an ideology that is not realistic when it comes to commerce or the wellbeing and safety of consumers who need the natural gas from this pipeline to heat their homes. For the record, IECA and its member companies support cost-effective production of renewable energy and its many environmental benefits. However, renewable energy is not a viable alternative to replace natural gas in manufacturing.”

“Manufacturing companies cannot operate facilities on electricity alone, whether it is produced from renewable energy, natural gas, nuclear, hydro, or coal. Our equipment will only operate on natural gas. And, natural gas on a Btu basis costs substantially less than a Btu of electricity. This is important because manufacturers compete globally and the competition is very tough. Business orders can be won or lost based on pennies on the dollar. If costs are not kept low, our products will be displaced by foreign imports. Due to technical limitations of manufacturers, if we were forced to stop using natural gas, we would have no choice but to shut down.”

The filing goes on to urge approvals for the pipeline project so as to not negatively impact commerce across the US, citing the integrated supply chain of manufacturers and how disruptions due to energy  would have costly ramifications across the chain of goods required in manufacturing processes. IECA stated that manufacturing companies cannot grow without increased supplies of natural gas and that, in fact, a more accelerated and streamlined pipeline permitting process is necessary to enable companies to more agilely make capital investments and compete more effectively in their respective global markets.

The IECA has aggressively been representing the manufacturing sector before the FERC in several pipeline projects under review and continues to make these bold and emphatic arguments in favor of keeping natural gas at the forefront of America’s energy policies.

Plan to Succeed in 2017!

Successful companies and organizations, and even individuals, rely on planning to get them where they are going. In fact, it’s hard to accomplish anything without a plan. Whether you are cooking Christmas dinner for the family, coaching your son’s little league team, or running a business, you need a plan to guide you to success. When it comes to organizations, strategic planning helps leaders determine where to invest their valuable time, human capital, material resources, and money, and it all boils down to answering three key questions:

  • Where are we now?
  • Where do we want to go?
  • How will we get there?

Where are we now? Start by reviewing your organization’s foundation – its mission statement and core values. Is the mission statement still a reflection of what your organization is about? And are your core values really central to your daily business and a guide for your employees’ daily activities? Taking a close look at where you are can sound easy, but often leaders see themselves and their organizations as they want to see themselves and not actually how they appear to others. It’s important to conduct a thorough analysis. External and internal audits can help leaders get a clear understanding of their organization, its marketplace, competitive environment and competencies. Traditionally organizations perform a SWOT analysis. SWOT stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats, and this type of analysis helps to assess the organization’s strategic position with an eye on its operating environment. Where do we want to go? Next the organization and its leadership need to identify what’s important and what it would like to achieve. What will the organization look like in the future? What is the future I want to create for the organization? This is an opportunity to consider the organization’s competitive advantages and develop goals that capitalize on those, while also looking for ways to shore up any organizational weaknesses that might impede progress toward defined goals. Often organizations will create short-term “vision statements” that prioritize goals and guide employees’ activities over the course of 5 – 10 years as the organization moves toward its strategic goals. How will we get there? With goals defined it’s now time to consider the timeline and steps necessary to achieve each individual goal. Who is accountable? What are the key activities that need to occur to achieve the vision? How will resources be allocated to move the plan forward? What are specific, measurable and realistic targets of accomplishment? How will performance and achievement be monitored and tracked? And how often will the plan be re-evaluated and course corrections considered through the process? This is the final stage of strategic planning, but by no means the end of the process. Here organizations and their leaders clearly state the strategic objectives, the short-term goals, priorities and initiatives that will help them achieve their objectives. They define the action items, develop the benchmarks for each goal and its action items, and then roll out the plan to key stakeholders who will work the plan and hold the organization and its leaders accountable for progress. As the plan rolls into action it is critical to review the plan on an ongoing basis and refine it as necessary. Over time it’s possible that goals evolve into new goals or perhaps even become obsolete as the marketplace dictates, but with a plan in place it becomes easier for an organization to assess and navigate whatever challenges and opportunities arise in the future. A well-defined strategic plan ensures your organization stays on track and focused for success. How can the Gas Authority help? If you participated in one of the Fall Regional Meetings you heard about our plans to expand the work we do in helping our Members prepare annual budget forecasts. Today, we prepare an annual forecast of revenue from the sale of gas and purchased gas cost, resulting in expected gross margin. Estimates of operating and maintenance costs, transfers to the general fund, and any capital expenditures are prepared locally in budget preparation. Collectively, this gives the Member the necessary information to establish a fiscal budget for the natural gas enterprise. While this is good and important work, it does little to help a Member anticipate or plan what is to happen over the next five or ten years, or to analyze past trends. In an effort to be of service to our Members, we are planning to expand the standard budget forecast to include multi-year projections. This will help identify and measure trends being experienced by the Member, and very importantly, provide a means to establish system growth goals. The end-game is for our Members to retain and grow customers and burner-tips. We all know there is no such thing as status quo when it comes to utility enterprises, they are either growing or declining. A growing gas system is a healthy gas system.

Return to Top

Natural Gas Exploration in Georgia?

by Scott Tolleson, Director, Member Services & Government Affairs

The Coosa River Basin Initiative (CRBI) continues its efforts to limit access to natural gas reserves in the Conasauga Shale of northwest Georgia by asking the State of Georgia to preemptively regulate drilling practices that include hydraulic fracturing or “fracking.”  CRBI is conducting town hall meetings and attending city council and county commission meetings throughout northern Georgia in its efforts to sharply control an industry that does not even operate in Georgia today.    On November 14th, the CRBI attended the Summerville’s City Council meeting and asked the city to pass a resolution aimed at pressuring state lawmakers to update the current law that regulates the oil and natural gas industry in Georgia. The resolution contains language that expresses opinion presented as facts, and includes inflammatory language such as, “oil and natural gas exploration present a clear and present danger to the quality of life in our rural communities as well as our groundwater and surface water resources.”  These statements ignore the proven safety record of the oil and natural industry and findings by multiple government agencies.  The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) conducted a study of approximately 30,000 oil and natural gas wells that were “fracked” between 2006 and 2012 and found no incidents of “fracking” fluids in ground water.  The EPA concluded that “fracking” had not led to widespread, systematic impacts on drinking sources in the United States.”   As natural gas providers, we know the benefits that clean, affordable, secure, reliable and available sources of natural gas can provide.  Natural gas prices are at 15-year lows and that reduces the cost of heating our homes, running our businesses and fueling our factories.  Georgia continues to be named as one of the best states in which to do business, and low energy costs remain a key factor of job creation.    As we hone our skills as natural gas “ambassadors,” it’s important to recognize and effectively address efforts to severely limit access to this important fuel.  Whether it is limiting access to oil and natural gas reserves or blocking construction of pipelines, these needless battles only lead to higher costs for consumers and create hurdles to economic development.    If CRBI or other organizations approach your city or town, please contact Scott Tolleson at 404-218-1749 or sstolleson@gasauthority.com to obtain the facts about “fracking.”